Two voters will be one million dollars richer if a referendum passes in Arizona.
Now that's voter incentive!! Much better for the voter than say, the "bag-o-pork-rinds" you get for your vote in Appalachia.
Glenn Reynolds and others say this effort will just bring "stupid people" out to vote. How anyone can tell the difference between a stupid voter or non-stupid is puzzling to me.
While pundits have debated the issue, I would say voters will approve of this measure by a huge margin. Why indeed wait for some elusive outcome in the elections to provide a measurable benefit, when you can take a chance that your choice (no matter what it is) can make you an InstaMillionaire?
And does the "stupid people" reference indicate that some folks consider that some people need a 'stupidity test" in order to have the right to vote?
Then again, is voting so hateful and despised that a million dollar carrot has to be dangled out before you?
Arizona also has a referendum which if passed would require ballots be sent by mail to every eligible voter who could then vote by mail. And still someone in both primary and general elections will get the million clams.
Hmpf! In Tennessee, all we get is a non-binding referendum which allows for government to give property tax breaks to the elderly, with zero promise the government will actually create such a law. Oh and another stupid law (yes, I say there are only stupid acts of legislation, not stupid voters) to ban certain types of marriage even though we already HAVE a law banning certain types of marriage.
Yeesh. At least we could get a beer coupon or something.
UPDATE: The Arizona voters rejected the referendum and said no to a million dollar payoff. Whattaya know??